Authors:
Everistus Rikardus, Robertus Pecamuya

Addresses:
Department of Public Administration, Yaleka Maro College of Social and Political Sciences, Merauke, Western New Guinea, Indonesia.

Abstract:

This study examines the design and implementation of conflict-sensitive decentralisation in large-scale agricultural governance, with a focus on Southern Papua, Indonesia, and draws comparative insights from Mindanao (Philippines) and Ratanakiri (Cambodia). The objectives are threefold: (1) to analyse key elements of conflict-sensitive decentralisation in fragile regions; (2) to identify challenges and opportunities in integrating state regulations with customary institutions; and (3) to formulate policy recommendations for more legitimate and effective agricultural governance. Employing a qualitative comparative case study, the research relies on systematic literature reviews and policy document analysis guided by the PRISMA protocol. It draws on peer-reviewed publications, international agency reports, and national statistics. The findings reveal that effective decentralisation in fragile, post-conflict contexts depends not only on normative institutional design but also on multi-level coordination, recognition of customary law, bureaucratic capacity, and participatory mechanisms. While Mindanao and Ratanakiri demonstrate the benefits of hybrid governance and inclusive participation, Southern Papua illustrates persistent institutional and socio-political constraints that hinder legitimacy and sustainability. The study contributes empirically by documenting underexplored governance dynamics in fragile regions, theoretically by integrating polycentric governance and institutional bricolage with conflict-sensitive decentralisation, and practically by offering policy recommendations that emphasise hybrid governance platforms, capacity building, and participatory conflict-risk assessments. 

Keywords: Sensitive Decentralisation; Agricultural Governance; Polycentric Governance; Institutional Bricolage; Policy Reform; Regional Development; Agricultural Sector.

Received on: 15/08/2024, Revised on: 03/10/2024, Accepted on: 19/11/2024, Published on: 07/06/2025

DOI: 10.69888/FTSHS.2025.000482

FMDB Transactions on Sustainable Humanities and Society, 2025 Vol. 2 No. 2, Pages: 83-91

• Views : 31
• Downloads : 7

Download PDF